1. Pollan M. Playing God in the garden. New York Times Magazine. 25 October 1998. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/25/magazine/playing-god-in-the-garden.html
2. US Food and Drug Administration. Statement of policy: Foods derived from new plant varieties. FDA Federal Register. 29 May 1992; 57(104): 229.
3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Frequently asked questions on EFSA GMO risk assessment. 15 May 2006.
4. European Commission. GMOs in a nutshell. 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biotechnology/qanda/a1_en.print.htm
5. Tokar B. Deficiencies in federal regulatory oversight of genetically engineered crops. Institute for Social Ecology Biotechnology Project. June 2006. http://environmentalcommons.org/RegulatoryDeficiencies.html
6. Freese W, Schubert D. Safety testing and regulation of genetically engineered foods. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2004: 299-324.
7. Kahl L. Memorandum to Dr James Maryanski, FDA biotechnology coordinator, about the Federal Register document, “Statement of policy: Foods from genetically modified plants”. US Food & Drug Administration. 8 January 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/01/01.pdf
8. Guest GB. Memorandum to Dr James Maryanski, biotechnology coordinator: Regulation of transgenic plants – FDA Draft Federal Register Notice on Food Biotechnology. US Department of Health & Human Services. 5 February 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/08/08.pdf
9. Matthews EJ. Memorandum to Toxicology Section of the Biotechnology Working Group: “Safety of whole food plants transformed by technology methods”. US Food & Drug Administration. October 28 1991. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/02/02.pdf
10. Shibko SL. Memorandum to James H. Maryanski, biotechnology coordinator, CFSAN: Revision of toxicology section of the “Statement of policy: Foods derived from genetically modified plants”. US Food & Drug Administration. Institution. Date 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/03/03.pdf
11. Pribyl LJ. Comments on the March 18, 1992 version of the Biotechnology Document. US Food & Drug Administration. 18 March 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/12/ljpp.pdf
12. Pribyl LJ. Comments on Biotechnology Draft Document, 2/27/92. US Food & Drug Administration. 6 March 1992. http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/04/04.pdf
13. Sudduth MA. Genetically engineered foods – fears and facts: An interview with FDA’s Jim Maryanski. FDA Consumer. January–February 1993; 11–14. http://web.archive.org/web/20090202053904/http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/consumer/Con00191.html
14. Bittman M. Why aren’t GMO foods labeled? New York Times. 15 February 2011. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/why-arent-g-m-o-foods-labeled
15. US Food and Drug Administration. Biotechnology consultation agency response letter BNF No. 000001. 27 January. 1995. http://www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161129.htm
16. Millstone E, Brunner E, Mayer S. Beyond “substantial equivalence”. Nature. 1999; 401(6753): 525–526.
17. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology: Concepts and Principles: OECD Publishing; 1993.
18. Pusztai A, Bardocz S, Ewen SWB. Genetically modified foods: Potential human health effects. In: D’Mello JPF, ed. Food Safety: Contaminants and Toxins. Wallingford, Oxon: CABI Publishing 2003:347–372.
19. Nodari RO, Guerra MP. Implications of transgenics for environmental and agricultural sustainability. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. Jul-Oct 2000; 7(2): 481-491.
20. Zdunczyk Z. In vivo experiments on the safety evaluation of GM components of feeds and foods. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 2001; 10(Supplement 1): 195-210.
21. Zolla L, Rinalducci S, Antonioli P, Righetti PG. Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J Proteome Res. May 2008; 7(5): 1850-1861.
22. Lappé M, Bailey B, Childress C, Setchell KDR. Alterations in clinically important phytoestrogens in genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soybean. Journal of Medicinal Food. 1999; 1: 241–245.
23. Shewmaker C, Sheehy JA, Daley M, Colburn S, Ke DY. Seed-specific overexpression of phytoene synthase: Increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. Plant J. 1999; 20(4): 401–412X.
24. Jiao Z, Si XX, Li GK, Zhang ZM, Xu XP. Unintended compositional changes in transgenic rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.) studied by spectral and chromatographic analysis coupled with chemometrics methods. J Agric Food Chem. Feb 10 2010; 58(3): 1746-1754.
25. Zhou J, Ma C, Xu H, et al. Metabolic profiling of transgenic rice with cryIAc and sck genes: an evaluation of unintended effects at metabolic level by using GC-FID and GC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 15 Mar 2009; 877(8-9): 725-732.
26. US Department of Agriculture. Frequently asked questions about biotechnology. 2010. http://1.usa.gov/hVIRYq
27. Vidal J. WikiLeaks: US targets EU over GM crops. The Guardian. January 3 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/03/wikileaks-us-eu-gm-crops
28. Euractiv.com. US lobbied EU to back GM crops: WikiLeaks. 4 January 2011. http://www.euractiv.com/global-europe/us-lobbied-eu-back-gm-crops-wikileaks-news-500960
29. EINNEWS. Wikileaks document pushes genetically modified food for African countries. 1 December 2010. http://www.einnews.com/pr-news/248883-wikileaks-document-pushes-genetically-modified-food-for-african-countries
30. Laskawy T. Wikileaks: State Dept wants intel on African acceptance of GMOs. GRIST. 29 November 2010. http://www.grist.org/article/2010-11-29-wikileaks-state-dept-wants-intel-on-african-acceptance-of-gmos
31. Domingo JL. Health risks of GM foods: Many opinions but few data. Science. 2000; 288(5472): 1748–1749.
32. Michaels D. Doubt is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health: Oxford University Press; 2008.
33. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2003; 326: 1167.
34. Lexchin J. Those who have the gold make the evidence: How the pharmaceutical industry biases the outcomes of clinical trials of medications. Sci Eng Ethics. Feb 15 2011.
35. Huss A, Egger M, Hug K, Huweiler-Müntener K, Röösli M. Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: Systematic review of experimental studies. Environmental Health Perspectives. January 2007; 115: 1–4.
36. Diels J, Cunha M, Manaia C, Sabugosa-Madeira B, Silva M. Association of financial or professional conflict of interest to research outcomes on health risks or nutritional assessment studies of genetically modified products. Food Policy. 2011; 36: 197–203.
37. Domingo JL, Bordonaba JG. A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Environ Int. Feb 4 2011; 37: 734–742.
38. Séralini GE, Cellier D, Spiroux de Vendomois J. New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. May 2007; 52(4): 596–602.
39. CRIIGEN. Revelations on the toxicity of GMOs – CRIIGEN reveals serious anomalies observed in rats fed on GMOs. 2005. http://www.criigen.org/SiteEn/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=20&Itemid=87
40. Dalli J. GMOs: Towards a better, more informed decision-making process. 17 March 2011. http://bit.ly/zj8BZu
41. Waltz E. Under wraps – Are the crop industry’s strong-arm tactics and close-fisted attitude to sharing seeds holding back independent research and undermining public acceptance of transgenic crops? Nature Biotechnology. October 2009; 27(10): 880–882.
42. Kok EJ, Kuiper HA. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops. Trends in Biotechnology. 2003; 21: 439–444.
43. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Annual declaration of interests – Esther Kok. 3 August 2010. https://doi.efsa.europa.eu/doi/doiweb/wg/71722
44. Then C, Bauer-Panskus A. European Food Safety Authority: A playing field for the biotech industry. TestBiotech. 1 December 2011. http://www.testbiotech.de/sites/default/files/EFSA_Playing_Field_of_ILSI.pdf
45. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology, prepared by a Task Force of the ILSI International Food Biotechnology Committee. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2004; 3: 38–104.
46. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal. 2010; 8(11): 1879–1990.
47. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified animals and on animal health and welfare aspects. EFSA Journal. 2012; 10(1): 2501. [2543 pp.].
48. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: The role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol. Mar 2008; 46 Suppl 1: S2-70.
49. European Commission. Commission implementing regulation (EU) No…. on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006. 2012.
50. Padgette SR, Taylor NB, Nida DL, et al. The composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean seeds is equivalent to that of conventional soybeans. J Nutr. Mar 1996; 126(3): 702-716.
51. Taylor NB, Fuchs RL, MacDonald J, Shariff AR, Padgette SR. Compositional analysis of glyphosate-tolerant soybeans treated with glyphosate. J Agric Food Chem. Oct 1999; 47(10): 4469-4473.
52. Hilbeck A, Meier M, Römbke J, Jänsch S, Teichmann H, Tappeser B. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants - concepts and controversies. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2011; 23(13).
53. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). ILSI Crop Composition Database: Version 42011. http://www.cropcomposition.org/query/index.html
54. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the submission of applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed and genetically modified plants for food or feed uses under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. EFSA Journal. 2011; 9(7): 1–27.
55. Royal Society of Canada. Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada. An Expert Panel Report on the Future of Food Biotechnology. 2001. http://www.rsc.ca//files/publications/expert_panels/foodbiotechnology/GMreportEN.pdf
56. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities. 17 April 2001: 1–38.
57. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union. 18 October 2003; 268: 1–23.
58. European Food Safety Authority Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Guidance document on selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants. EFSA Journal. 2011; 9(5): 2149.
59. Swanby H. Ongoing concerns about harmonisation of biosafety regulations in Africa. Melville, South Africa. African Centre for Biosafety. November 2009. http://www.biosafety-info.net/file_dir/2484217664b02137ac5049.pdf
60. Ministry of environment and forests I. Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) and Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB). 2010. http://moef.nic.in/divisions/cs/GEAC.htm Accessed 18 April, 2012
61. Mudur GS. Experts admit GM brinjal report fault. The Telegraph (India). 26 September 2010. http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100927/jsp/nation/story_12986605.jsp
62. Scientific American. Do seed companies control GM crop research? 13 August 2009. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-crop-research
63. Lotter D. The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science – Part 1: The development of a flawed enterprise. Int Jrnl of Soc of Agr & Food. 2007; 16(1): 31–49.
64. Lotter D. The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science – Part 2: Academic capitalism and the loss of scientific integrity. Int Jrnl of Soc of Agr & Food. 2008; 16(1): 50–68.
65. Waltz E. Battlefield. Nature. 3 September 2009; 461(7260): 27–32.
66. Pollack A. Crop scientists say biotechnology seed companies are thwarting research. New York Times. 20 February 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/20crop.html
67. Waltz E. Monsanto relaxes restrictions on sharing seeds for research. Nature Biotechnology. October 13 2010; 28: 996.
68. GM Free Cymru. Independent GM researcher wins court victory for defamation [press release]. 19 January 2011. http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/1281
69. Rosi-Marshall EJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, et al. Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect headwater stream ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 9 2007; 104(41): 16204-16208.
70. Miller HI, Morandini P, Ammann K. Is biotechnology a victim of anti-science bias in scientific journals? Trends Biotechnol. 2008; 26(3): 122–125.
71. Schmidt JE, Braun CU, Whitehouse LP, Hilbeck A. Effects of activated Bt transgene products (Cry1Ab, Cry3Bb) on immature stages of the ladybird Adalia bipunctata in laboratory ecotoxicity testing. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. Feb 2009; 56(2): 221-228.
72. Rauschen S. A case of “pseudo science”? A study claiming effects of the Cry1Ab protein on larvae of the two-spotted ladybird is reminiscent of the case of the green lacewing. Transgenic Res. Feb 2010; 19(1): 13-16.
73. Ricroch A, Berge JB, Kuntz M. Is the German suspension of MON810 maize cultivation scientifically justified? Transgenic Res. Feb 2010; 19(1): 1-12.
74. Alvarez-Alfageme F. Laboratory toxicity studies demonstrating no adverse effects of Cry1Ab and Cry3Bb1 to larvae of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): the importance of study design. Transgenic Research. June 2011; 20(3): 467-479.
75. Hilbeck A, McMillan JM, Meier M, Humbel A, Schlaepfer-Miller J, Trtikova M. A controversy re-visited: Is the coccinellid Adalia bipunctata adversely affected by Bt toxins? Environmental Sciences Europe. 15 February 2012; 24(10).
76. Hilbeck A, Meier M, Trtikova M. Underlying reasons of the controversy over adverse effects of Bt toxins on lady beetle and lacewing larvae. Environmental Sciences Europe. 15 February 2012; 24(9).
77. Rowell A. Don’t Worry, It’s Safe to Eat. London, UK: Earthscan Ltd; 2003.
78. Pusztai A. Home page. 2003. http://www.freenetpages.co.uk/hp/a.pusztai Accessed 17 April, 2012
79. GM-FREE magazine. Why I cannot remain silent: Interview with Dr Arpad Pusztai. August/September 1999; 1(3).
80. Powerbase. Arpad Pusztai. 2009. http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Arpad_Pusztai Accessed 17 April, 2012
81. Verhaag B. Scientists Under Attack [Film]. mercurymedia2009. http://www.scientistsunderattack.com
82. Ewen SW, Pusztai A. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet. Oct 16 1999; 354(9187): 1353-1354.
83. Higgins TJ. “Disturbing” GM findings were not based on sound science. Canberra Times. 4 June 2005. http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/3781
84. Pusztai A, Grant G, Bardocz S, et al. Expression of the insecticidal bean a-amylase inhibitor transgene has minimal detrimental effect on the nutritional value of peas fed to rats at 30% of the diet. Journal of Nutrition. 1999; 129: 1597–1603.
85. Quist D, Chapela IH. Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature. 29 November 2001; 414(6863): 541-543.
86. BBC Radio 4. Seeds of trouble. 7 January 2002.
87. BBC Newsnight. Row over GM crops – Mexican scientist tells Newsnight he was threatened because he wanted to tell the tTruth. 7 June 2002.
88. Mann C. Has GM Corn “Invaded” Mexico? Science. 1 March 2002; 295: 1617.
89. Kinderlerer J. Regarding AgBioView: Chapela and Mexican corn, China, New Zealand support up, Lomborg, Peanut map. AgBioView listserv: AgBioView; 2001.
90. Monbiot G. The fake persuaders. The Guardian (UK). 14 May 2002. http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2002/05/14/the-fake-persuaders
91. Dalton RL. Transgenic Corn Found Growing in Mexico. Nature. 27 September 2001; 413: 337.